This is expected behavior. Not having a CVE ID does not mean a finding is a "false positive" or that it is unimportant. It simply means the issue falls into a category of security weakness that isn't tracked by the global CVE system.

## The Difference Between Software Bugs and Security Weaknesses

To understand why some IDs are missing, it helps to distinguish between a specific software flaw and a general security weakness.

### 1. Configuration Issues (No CVE)

CVE's track flaws in specific versions of public software (e.g., a specific version of a web server or database). However, many security risks arise from **how that software is configured**, rather than the software itself.

* **Example:** A missing `Content-Security-Policy` header or an exposed `.git` directory is a serious risk, but it is a configuration choice, not a bug in the server software. Therefore, it will not have a CVE.

### 2. Custom Application Logic (No CVE)

Our scanning engine tests your proprietary applications and custom code. If we find a vulnerability in your specific login page or API, that vulnerability is unique to your organization.

* **Example:** If your custom code allows a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack, this is a valid vulnerability. However, because your code is not publicly distributed software, there is no public CVE entry for it.

### 3. General Best Practices

Some findings flag deviations from industry best practices rather than exploitable hacks.

* **Example:** Using an older SSL/TLS certificate or weak cipher suites. These are flagged to help you harden your security posture, but they are often categorized as general weaknesses rather than specific CVEs.